At HerbMagazines we take accuracy seriously, especially when writing about health. This policy explains how our content is created and maintained.
Our standards
- Evidence-based: health claims are supported by human clinical research, systematic reviews or official guidance. Where evidence is limited or comes only from laboratory or animal studies, we say so clearly.
- Balanced: we describe benefits and risks, including side effects, drug interactions and groups who should avoid a herb.
- Transparent sourcing: every article ends with a list of sources and further reading.
- Plain English: we explain science clearly without hype, miracle cures or fear-mongering.
- Region-aware: we include UK and US terms, measurements and guidance where they differ.
Sources we rely on
- Peer-reviewed journals and Cochrane systematic reviews
- NHS, NICE and the MHRA (UK)
- NCCIH, NIH and the FDA (US)
- European Medicines Agency herbal monographs
- Royal Horticultural Society, university extension services and botanical gardens
Corrections and updates
We review articles regularly and update them when new research is published. If you spot an error, please contact us and we will review it promptly.
Independence
Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Advertising may appear on the site to support our work, but advertisers have no say in what we write.
Not medical advice
Our content is for information and education. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
